Constructivist Learning Design: From Theory to Practice

Challenge: How do you bridge the gap between educational theory and real-world application? During my doctoral coursework, I tackled this question head-on by translating constructivist learning principles into practical, implementable designs.

My Approach: Rather than creating theoretical exercises, I drew from active courses in my instructional design portfolio to develop three research-informed blueprints that demonstrate how constructivist pedagogy solves real learning challenges.

Blueprint 1: Problem Based Learning inspired by ARCH 170N - Sustainable Architecture

Research insight applied: Complex real-world problems require learners to construct knowledge through authentic investigation. Design solution: Created a flexible instructor guide for ARCH 170N that engages students in water management challenges through both online and face-to-face modalities. The blueprint demonstrates how to scaffold complex problem-solving while maintaining academic rigor.

Blueprint 2: Mobile Learning In Business First Year Seminar (PSU 006)

Research insight applied: Metacognitive strategies are most effective when integrated into authentic contexts. Design solution: Developed a goal-setting framework for PSU 006 (Business First Year Seminar) that transforms informal conference experiences into structured learning opportunities. This design bridges formal coursework with professional development.

Blueprint 3: Teaching for Understanding in ARCH 170N - Sustainable Architecture

Research insight applied: "Understanding" as a learning objective requires specific frameworks to become measurable and meaningful. Design solution: Adapted the TFU (Teaching for Understanding) framework for sustainable architecture content, demonstrating how to make abstract concepts concrete while maintaining pedagogical integrity.

Previous
Previous

Belonging Resource Hub

Next
Next

Translating Research into Action